Acquisition
The USS Harvey C. Barnum Jr. under construction at Bath Iron Works in July 2023. (Photo via Bath Iron Works)
Design, Decide, Forget: Why the Navy Needs a Lessons-Learned Center for Shipbuilding
Marcus Jones, Center for International Maritime Security
The U.S. Navy needs establish a dedicated "lessons-learned center" for shipbuilding to systematically capture, analyze, and apply knowledge from its extensive experience. This institutional mechanism is crucial to prevent the recurrence of avoidable mistakes in major acquisition programs, thereby improving program outcomes and achieving the Navy's long-term force design goals.
- Past Failures: Despite repeated calls and initiatives dating back to the 1970s, the Navy has consistently failed to institutionalize a lasting capacity for acquisition-oriented organizational learning in shipbuilding. Data was often gathered but not practically applied or preserved.
- Knowledge Fragmentation: Major ship classes are designed infrequently, often every 20-30 years, leading to a loss of institutional memory as personnel involved in new projects lack direct experience from the last.
- Successful Models: Feasible precedents exist within the defense sector, such as the U.S. Army’s Center for Army Acquisition Lessons Learned (CAALL), which uses a web-enabled portal, structured data, and professional analysis to provide authoritative acquisition-specific lessons.
A Practical Framework for Transitioning Technology to the Warfighter
Debra Zides, Natalie Faucher, et al., Defense Acquisition Magazine
The Transition Maturity Framework (TMaF) is a critical tool developed by the Operational Energy Innovation Directorate (OE-I), in collaboration with MITRE, to address the persistent challenge of transitioning defense technologies from innovative ideas to fielded capabilities. By integrating five readiness dimensions and providing actionable guidance, TMaF aims to overcome the "valley of death" and ensure technologies are Warfighter-validated and mission-relevant, not just technically feasible.
- Five Dimensions: TMaF incorporates three existing measure of readiness level and crucially adds two new dimensions: the Requirements Readiness Level (RRL), which measures alignment to a validated, funded Warfighter capability need, and the Warfighter Readiness Level (WRL), which assesses the extent a technology has been Warfighter-tested and adopted.
Related: Transition Maturity Framework (TMaF)
Making the Defense Acquisition System More Warfighter-Centric: Increasing Stakeholder Engagement and Innovation at the Tactical Edge
Jeff Kwastel, MITRE
This report from MITRE argues that the Defense Acquisition System (DAS) must become more warfighter-centric, shifting from merely viewing warfighters as consumers to integrating them as active stakeholders. This change is vital for delivering adaptable capabilities at the pace of modern battlefields.
The Defense Acquisition System Digital Acquisition Policy Sandbox: A Tool for Providing Real-Time Understanding of Changes to the Defense Acquisition System
Debra Zides and Jeff Kwastel, MITRE
The Defense Acquisition System (DAS) is increasingly challenged by the rapid pace and complexity of statutory, Executive Order, and departmental policy changes, which create cascading disruptions and delays across the Department of Defense (DoD). To address this, MITRE proposes a Digital Acquisition Policy Sandbox (DAPS), a platform that would leverage AI and data analytics to provide real-time understanding of policy impacts and empower stakeholders to navigate change with agility and precision.
Acquisition Workforce
Image from War on the Rocks, Building a 21st Century Defense Acquisition Workforce, https://warontherocks.com/2019/05/building-a-21st-century-defense-acquisition-workforce/
The Futility of FAR Reform: It's About People, Not Rules
Lt. Col. Matthew J. Fleharty, USAF, The Nash & Cibinic Report
This article argues that federal acquisition reform efforts often miss the mark by focusing on rules rather than people. The acquisition workforce must read, interpret, and apply FAR rules, no matter how simple or streamlined. A true revolution in acquisition requires substantial investments in rigorous, in-person professional education for the workforce, focusing on critical skills like regulatory analysis, logical thinking, and effective contract design.
Institutional Amnesia And The Neglect Of The Federal Acquisition Workforce
Jessica Tillipman & Steven L. Schooner, The Government Contractor
The federal acquisition community’s persistent focus on regulatory overhauls, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rewrite, continues to neglect the critical need for sustained investment in the acquisition workforce, leading to a depleted staff unable to meet the nation's procurement demands. This ongoing "institutional amnesia" prioritizes procedural changes over human capital, resulting in significant operational failures and an erosion of public trust.
- Decades of Decline: Despite spending approximately $755 billion on contract awards in FY 2024, the acquisition workforce is "smaller, more junior, and...less experienced than a generation ago" due to mandated reductions beginning in 1989.
- Predictable Failures: The failure to recruit, develop, and retain this workforce leads to inefficient use of public funds, increased risks of integrity failures, and a diminished ability to provide basic services, fostering a government overly dependent on contractors.
- Cycle of Neglect: New mandates are piled onto a depleted workforce without proportional investment, making it impossible for the system to function effectively. There is a broad consensus, including from the OECD, that professionalizing this workforce is "essential to effective governance."
Defense & Strategy
James Williams, computer scientist with the 580th Software Engineering Squadron, starts up the HH-60 cockpit mockup unit simulator at Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, May 23, 2025. Williams saw component functions that needed to be updated in real-time, making the process of upgrading capabilities more efficient. (U.S. Air Force photo by C Arce)
The Pentagon’s Software Revolution and Its Testing Dilemma
Douglas C. Schmidt and Nickolas H. Guertin, War on the Rocks
The Pentagon's rapid embrace of AI-driven, software-defined warfare and accelerated acquisition promises a revolution in defense capabilities, yet it faces a critical dilemma: ensuring these advanced systems are battle-ready amidst severe cuts to its independent operational testing capabilities. This risks fielding unproven technologies that could fail in combat, highlighting an urgent need to reinvest in a modernized, tech-augmented test enterprise that blends human expertise with emerging tools.
- Speed of Trust: Counterintuitively, cutting testing can slow technology adoption, as commanders hesitate to trust systems with unknown limits and quirks. Rigorous, transparent testing is vital for building confidence in all systems, especially unpredictable AI.
- Reinvestment Needed: To safeguard its digital revolution, the Defense Department must "reinvest in a modernized, tech-augmented test enterprise" that combines new tools with "hard-won human expertise". This requires sustained investment, responsible automation, and preserving remaining expertise.
Ukraine’s milestone shows drones prevent defeat, but don’t secure victory
Patrick Tucker, DefenseOne
Ukraine’s unprecedented deployment of over a million drones showcases rapid technological innovation and agile procurement, a model the U.S. is now emulating to accelerate its own defense capabilities. However, this drone revolution, while preventing defeat, has not secured decisive victory or air superiority, highlighting the enduring necessity of traditional complex platforms alongside emergent, democratized technologies, and the critical future role of AI.
Distributed Logistics and Deterrence
Maj. Christopher M. Salerno, U.S. Army, Military Review
The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command must transition from centralized to distributed logistical infrastructure, to effectively deter China and enhance resilience in the region. This strategic shift demands significant investment, robust diplomatic engagement with allies, and careful mitigation of new risks to ensure credible power projection and sustainment in a contested environment.
Industry
Navy Lt. Nicholas Swanda, left, and Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Norman Williams inspect pressure valves in the torpedo room of the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Alaska, July 24, 2018. Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs are helping to fill gaps in declining domestic manufacturing capabilities and parts obsolescence that threaten the sustainability of aging weapons systems like Ohio-class submarines. Photo credit: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Eli Buguey
Major changes to SBIR program debated as reauthorization deadline nears
Jason Miller, Federal News Network
In the lead-up to it reauthorization deadline on September 30, the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program is caught in a legislative tug-of-war between those advocating for significant modernization and those defending its long-standing success.
- Reform Push: Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) introduced the INNOVATE Act, seeking to transform the 43-year-old SBIR program to align with 21st-century research and development. Ernst's office claims that the bill ensures funds go to the "best and brightest" developing technology for warfighters and prevents funding for SBIR "mills" that are gaming the system.
- Defense Concerns: Supporters of the current program, such as the Small Business Technology Council, argue that the INNOVATE Act would harm small businesses and agencies and is trying to solve problems that are not widespread. They believe it promotes pushes the program toward a venture capital-like investment model, which they contend is unsuitable for early-stage innovation.
Navy’s MIB Program Celebrates Year of Focused Effort to Strengthen Maritime Industrial Capability and Capacity
Maritime Industrial Base Program Staff, US Navy
The U.S. Navy’s Maritime Industrial Base (MIB) Program marked its first anniversary, showcasing significant progress in strengthening America's shipbuilding and repair capacity to meet critical fleet expansion demands. Through integrated efforts in advanced manufacturing, supplier development, and workforce training, the program is revitalizing the industrial base to build and sustain the fleet the nation needs.
- Modern Production: The MIB Program transitioned advanced manufacturing to the fleet, saving 30-45 days of dry dock maintenance on USS Virginia and installing 11 program-funded 3D printers on ships and overseas facilities for onboard repair.
- Skilled Workforce: Workforce initiatives celebrated 5,775 new hires on National Signing Day across more than 450 employers, contributing to over 10,000 maritime industrial base job placements since the program's inception.
- Expanded Capacity: Since Fiscal Year 2018, nearly 800 projects across 39 states have increased supplier capacity by over 2.5 times, including a 400 percent boost in torpedo production at L3 Harris.
Research
Sailors and Boeing team members prepare to move an unmanned MQ-25 Stingray aircraft into the hangar bay of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush in Norfolk, Va., Nov. 30, 2021. Photo by Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Noah J. Eidson.
Accelerating Capability to the Fleet: Rapid Fielding of Small Unmanned Surface Vehicles
John Phillips, Colorado State
This dissertation outlines a novel framework designed to accelerate the fielding of new capabilities to the Fleet, particularly in robotics and autonomous systems, demonstrating its effectiveness through a case study focused on rapidly fielding small Unmanned Surface Vehicles (sUSVs) to the US Pacific Fleet between 2022 and 2025.
Defense Software for a Contested Future: Agility, Assurance, and Incentives
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Prompted by a request from DARPA, this report addresses the need for secure, reliable, and agile defense software. It provides recommendations for the Department of Defense to enhance software engineering and management, specifically to mitigate cyber risk and allow for rapid system evolution to meet evolving mission requirements.
ICBM Modernization: Air Force Actions Needed to Expeditiously Address Critical Risks to Sentinel Transition
Government Accountability Office
This GAO report calls for urgent Air Force actions to address significant challenges and risks in the complex transition from the aging Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) system to the new Sentinel system. The report emphasizes the critical need for comprehensive planning, particularly a robust risk management framework, to ensure a successful and timely modernization effort.
Other Transaction Agreements: Improved Contracting Data Would Help DOD Assess Effectiveness
Government Accountability Office
While Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) provide DOD with flexibility for prototype development and attract new contractors, the absence of systematic tracking for how prototype OTAs transition into standard production contracts prevents a full assessment of their effectiveness in delivering warfighter capabilities.
Events
2025 Undersea Warfare Fall Conference
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA)
15-17 September 2025
Groton, CT
Fleet Maintenance and Modernization Symposium (FMMS) 2025
American Society of Naval Engineers
23-25 September 2025
San Diego, CA
28th Annual Systems & Mission Engineering Conference
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA)
Tampa, FL
27-30 October 2025
USSOCOM Innovation Foundry
SOFWERX
28-30 October 2025
Chantilly, VA
CALL FOR PAPERS & PANELS: Accelerating Warfighting Capabilities
Naval Postgraduate School's 23rd Annual Acquisition Research Symposium and Innovation Summit
DUE: 18 November 2025
I/ITSEC 2025: Optimizing Training: Ensuring Operational Dominance
National Training & Simulation Association (NTSA)
1-4 December 2025
Orlando, FL
CCM Institute Academic Symposium 2025
Commerce & Contract Management Institute
2-4 December 2025
Virtual
Creative Disruptors in the Desert
Creative Defense Foundation
20-21 February 2025
La Quinta, CA
One more thing...
Admiral Chester Nimitz signs as Supreme Allied Commander during formal surrender ceremonies on the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay. September 2, 1945. Directly behind him are (left-to-right): General of the Army Douglas MacArthur; Admiral William Halsey, USN, and Rear Admiral Forrest Sherman, USN. US Navy Photo.
How Fleet Admiral Nimitz Safeguarded Officer Education
NPS Public Affairs
Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz is known for his leadership in the Pacific theater during Word War II -- as well as for signing Japan's formal surrender aboard the USS Missouri in 1945. He is less known for his foresight in championing advanced officer education.
- Educational Foresight: In 1939, Nimitz prevented the planned closure of the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) and Naval War College. With the outbreak of war in Europe, the student populated dropped by 60% as officers were sent to duty posts at sea. Horrified, Nimitz reversed the closure plans and expanded classes to ensure officers were prepared for war. By 1941, the student population had tripled.
- Post-war Relocation: After World War II, as Chief of Naval Operations, Nimitz championed the relocation of the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) to Monterey, California, to ensure that future naval officers would receive the advanced technical education critical for modern warfare.
- Enduring Model: Nimitz's emphasis on education, science, and research established an enduring model for how NPS supports the fleet - not only with officer training, but by developing new technologies and operational concepts that continue to inform and shape today's Navy.
|